In April 2021 Wolfire Games (authors Overgrows and the creators of the Humble Bundle site) sued Valve – company Geiba Newella (Gabe Newll) allegedly violates antitrust legislation. Later Valve replied that the studio’s complaint was not supported by reliable evidence, so the judge should reject the lawsuit. As it became known today, the court agreed with the defenders of the company.
Recall Wolfire There were two main claims:
Steam holds 75 % of the PC-IGR market. Due to its dominant position Valve It requires the developers an unfair commission of 30 % and receives a lot of money from this.
On November 19, the court rejected the lawsuit of the developers, citing the failure of several arguments:
The court did not accept the arguments of the plaintiffs that the Steam store and the social platform are two separate products. Supposedly Valve illegally uses the “almost monopoly position” of Londer and the social site, and forces people to buy games through their store.
According to the judge, Valve did not change the requirements for the percentage of sales for the entire existence of Steam. The level of the commission in the "steam" store remained the same even with the advent of more loyal to the developers of trading floors.
The court did not find in the lawsuit Wolfire evidence that "forced practices" Valve adversely affect the quality of products.
As a result, the court ruled that Wolfire does not give sufficient facts about the damage to the market due to the alleged monopoly Steam. Request Valve The cancellation of the claim is partially satisfied – at Wolfire There are 30 days to make corrections to the document to file a complaint again.
November 20, 2021 Fans believe that they found a reference to GTAVI in GTA: The Trilogy
November 20, 2021 Someone put up for sale empty boxes of Goldeneye 007 cartridges for £ 2,445
The best comments
Funny! Here you created a product of analogues of which there were no, established the rules of use and began to develop it for many years. Over the years, your product grew up, improved, everyone was satisfied with the rules, the library and opportunities were replenished, everyone dreamed of getting to your main one with their products, and used your amenities. And then some devils come and want to squeeze out the dough with you just because you did something well. And you did anything bad, but you are bad in the faces of competitors, for it developed so that the whole audience goes to you, not to them … some kind of idiocy.
The court did not accept the arguments https://noidverificationcasinos.co.uk/usdt-casinos/ of the plaintiffs that the Steam store and the social platform are two separate products. Supposedly Valve illegally uses the “almost monopoly position” of Londer and the social platform, and forces people to buy games through their store.
It’s funny to call the “monopoly” Steam: he has competitors, but they are either not well-made enough (such as a torn Uconnect), or they offer a small number of games (Origin, Battle-Net). It’s just one too lazy to make a normal competitor to a normal promotion, other money is not a hunt for debugging and polishing, and the third generally consider do not want to accept games from other developers.
By the way, it’s not even that I respect Gaben, his brainchild and politics.
But that I do not feel this monopoly. I don’t feel that I am only necessary to buy in Steam. I often buy keys to steam bypassing steam. I often buy that not in the launcher of Steam. These things are not the majority, but I do not feel that I am attached to the stimulus. I am with Steam of my own free. Even if Steam did this with the help of cunning things, the feeling that “because you wanted it so” for me more than preserved.
Ave Gaben, Ave Steam, Ave Volvo
Steam is invincible, I even like it
Actually, this was expected from such an absurd claim. Not only did they set up part of the public against themselves, but they also lost the dry.
Absolutely delusional lawsuit and is not surprised that the court has rejected the density.
75% of the market for Steam. Well, probably there are reasons why they have 75%… and they are banal and simple.
1. Pioneers in digital distribution, as they say "who was the first to get up, is that and slippers"
2. The chic executed at the very site \ An extremely convenient interface with many functions (curators, recommendations, groups, chats, workshop and much, much more). The rest of the sites against the background of Steam look wretched (forgive me my favorite gog).
3. The largest game library
4. Regional prices. Honestly … I envy the Russian Federation, the prices are just funny. Personally, I often have to use the services of third -party distributors to buy keys, t.To. Prices in my region can be 2 times higher. And here I want to highlight the next point ..
5. All third-party sites that trade +- 10 years of persons. keys (I’m about proven services), almost always trading only Steam, t.e. Almost all of their keys only for activation in Steam.
I could spit and shout that they say “enough, tired! Service Gomno! and so "… But this is not so. Steam – chic and extremely convenient service. The most convenient today! And I’m glad he is! Thanks to Gaben
Xs how you can have something against Steam. Convenient, functional, discounts and nishtyaki, etc. D. PSStore and Nintendo Shop – “We’ll have no one who heard anything about the regions, we are not any refunds at all, but we just transfer money to the left uncles”
Steam is cool, but there are no accusations as for me
Aaaa, you mean that blog-post, the first comment of which asks the author to clarify the details of this mystical letter from Valv (even just details, and not evidence that this letter was), which the author, of course, did not make?
And you did not try to find out what a monopoly is and what activity is a monopoly?
Because the fact that you are the largest player in the market, and has become for them for natural reasons, does not yet turn you into a monopolist. And it does not give the right to other players smaller through the court to squeeze part of your business.
What am I talking about, the only difference is that the “pure” monopoly is when the consumer does not have alternatives in principle, and in the case of Steam there is an alternative, but significantly lower in quality
As I understand it, my proposal to launch the process of registering the developer Steam and read the agreement, and try to find this mythical point (and not find it, because it is not), you ignored?
Even if it were really so – what is the monopoly? Small laws are prohibited to use poppy? Pursue users of alternative systems? Cut the cables of the Internet to them? What, in fact, is actions aimed at establishing a monopoly?
And rightly they, with their stupid claims.
I used quotation marks not to ensure that my attitude towards this word was like an insult. I used them in order to emphasize just the fact that you wrote at the end-technically “Valve” monopoly, but practically-no, as there is a potential competition, but no one is particularly fighting for the place of the best online store of games, and since everything suits everything, then there is no harm to the market, which means that nothing happened happened.
It would be funny if Valv at one time patented a distribution store of digital games.
The situation when your company, in the course of the natural process of market development, occupies most of this market, also does not violate the antitrust law, and does not interfere with competition in the market.
In the United States, the status of "Monopoly" does not make the company a violator automatically. In the case of Steam, we can talk about a monopoly due to merit – "innocent monopoly".